WPV Software

A Safe Workplace is Everybody's Business

Case Studies In Workplace Violence & Harassment Compliance Failure

Case Study #1

Workplace-sexual-harassment
A woman was hired as a door-to-door salesperson for an alarm system company. The Female Employee was subject to ongoing and persistent harassment from her Manager on the basis of sex for over a year. This included the manager asking the Female Employee what kind of underwear she was wearing; commenting that when she crossed her arms she was hiding her chest from him; and referring to the Female Employee’s pop drink as ‘cotton panties.’ The Manager also asked the Female Employee whether she wanted to go to a hotel room for her birthday, and, on several occasions while at the office, invited the Female Employee to sit on his lap. In another incident, the Female Employee’s Manager stated he was “going to jump” on the Female Employee, and asked the Female Employee to have sex with him.

 

The Female Employee repeatedly requested that her Manager cease his harassing behavior and sexual solicitations. In response, the Manager told her that when the Female Employee became the Branch Manager, “she could harass people too. When the Female Employee complained to the corporate Respondent, she was told she was “being let go” two days later. The corporate Respondent then rescinded its termination of the Female Employee, but advised the Female Employee that she would have to continue to work alongside the personal Respondent Manager who was sexually harassing her.

At the hearing, the Respondent attempted to limit its liability by arguing that it was not aware of the Female Employee’s complaint and because of the Female Employee’s purported failure to make a complaint under the employer’s anti-harassment policy and procedure. This argument was rejected by the adjudicator who expressed a serious concern with the Respondent employer’s failure to investigate the complaint altogether. The HRTO held that the reasonableness of an employer’s response to a complaint of workplace harassment will be determined with reference to an employer’s own internal harassment policy. The adjudicator found against the employer based on the following criteria:

 

1. There is an obligation of promptness in dealing with a harassment complaint.

2. The company is aware that sexual harassment is prohibited conduct.

3. The company must deal with the issue seriously.

4. The company must demonstrate that there is a complaint mechanism in place

5. The company has an obligation to provide a healthy work environment.

6. There is an obligation for management to communicate its actions to a complainant.

 

The Female Employee was awarded damages of $18,000 against the company and Manager and an additional $5,000 against company for its failure to investigate.

 

Case Study #2

A trucking firm promoted an employee to manager. The new manager immediately started sexually harassing the firm’s female drivers. The drivers complained and the company fired the manager. The manager sued for wrongful dismissal and won the case. The judge had found that the manager was correct in pointing out:

  • The company had no policy in place regarding harassment;
  • The company did not conduct a proper investigation to hear the manager’s side of the story;
  • The manager was not trained on what was the difference between appropriate and inappropriate behavior.

 

In addition to legal fees, the company was fined $25,000 for not having the proper policies and procedures in place.